They cant rob you or your house.PrettyKasztan wrote:If i'm BELOW level 5 and I get robbed in my house, can people rob my house too or they have to leave it alone because i'm below lvl 5?
Q&A: In-game Rules
Moderators: Lead Admins, Senior Lead Admins
- Hater.
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:56 pm
- Ingame name: Aviel
- Location: Israel
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
About me LSRP Tester גולני לוחם |
Gabriel Moya - 18th Street Baby Gangsters
Makayla Shaw - W/S Neighborhood Bloods
Hugo Carrasquillo - S/C Los Gangsters XVIII
DeAngelo Brown East Side Hustler Crips
Mateo Gracia Los Cycos XVIII
Ernesto Torres Mara Salvatrucha XIII
Esteban Carlito Colonial Watts Avenue XXVII
- Junkie.
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Zemun, Serbia
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
You do not know what are you talking about.Zupps wrote:You need to stop posting your opinion. They aren't helping people. It's only a matter if you get caught when stealing afk peoples cars
večno izdrogiran zato što sam genije! Jebi se!
-
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:38 am
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
He's actually right. Stealing somebody's car while they're AFK is either powergaming or breaching the common courtesy rule.Junkie. wrote:You do not know what are you talking about.Zupps wrote:You need to stop posting your opinion. They aren't helping people. It's only a matter if you get caught when stealing afk peoples cars
- Hater.
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:56 pm
- Ingame name: Aviel
- Location: Israel
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
But at the same time:Charlie Brown wrote:He's actually right. Stealing somebody's car while they're AFK is either powergaming or breaching the common courtesy rule.Junkie. wrote:You do not know what are you talking about.Zupps wrote:You need to stop posting your opinion. They aren't helping people. It's only a matter if you get caught when stealing afk peoples cars
.Conspiracy wrote:You are allowed to be AFK (Away From Keyboard) for up to 10 minutes, provided you are not in a highly populated area or an area where people are likely to attempt to roleplay with you. AFK in public at own risk.
So once again, it depends on the circumstances and mostly the admin to decide.
About me LSRP Tester גולני לוחם |
Gabriel Moya - 18th Street Baby Gangsters
Makayla Shaw - W/S Neighborhood Bloods
Hugo Carrasquillo - S/C Los Gangsters XVIII
DeAngelo Brown East Side Hustler Crips
Mateo Gracia Los Cycos XVIII
Ernesto Torres Mara Salvatrucha XIII
Esteban Carlito Colonial Watts Avenue XXVII
- Zupps
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:50 am
- Ingame name: You already know
- Contact:
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Why don't you open your eyes, and read the post I responded that with. He says it depends if the person knows the admin basically. So yeah its an opinion. Admjns aren't supposed to take sides. Especially when rule breaking.Junkie. wrote:You do not know what are you talking about.Zupps wrote:You need to stop posting your opinion. They aren't helping people. It's only a matter if you get caught when stealing afk peoples cars
- grapefruit
- Gold Member
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:22 am
- Location: 1001 N Point Blvd,MD 21224
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
If rival faction members are coming to where you roleplay with your faction ( no one of the factions own the turf OOCly )
and provoking by tagging over your wall tags and you find them doing this and some of them are showing attitude by admitting and saying they tagged over it all and laughing afterwards confrontrating the said player(s) at their 'hood' and they begin to spit on you -
Is that a valid reason to do a attack on the said faction?
and provoking by tagging over your wall tags and you find them doing this and some of them are showing attitude by admitting and saying they tagged over it all and laughing afterwards confrontrating the said player(s) at their 'hood' and they begin to spit on you -
Is that a valid reason to do a attack on the said faction?
- Justice
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 1518
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:08 pm
- Location: r/2meirl4meirl
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Indeed it is.Crokz wrote:If rival faction members are coming to where you roleplay with your faction ( no one of the factions own the turf OOCly )
and provoking by tagging over your wall tags and you find them doing this and some of them are showing attitude by admitting and saying they tagged over it all and laughing afterwards confrontrating the said player(s) at their 'hood' and they begin to spit on you -
Is that a valid reason to do a attack on the said faction?
- grapefruit
- Gold Member
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:22 am
- Location: 1001 N Point Blvd,MD 21224
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Alright, any admin that can confirm this though or tester?Justice wrote:Indeed it is.Crokz wrote:If rival faction members are coming to where you roleplay with your faction ( no one of the factions own the turf OOCly )
and provoking by tagging over your wall tags and you find them doing this and some of them are showing attitude by admitting and saying they tagged over it all and laughing afterwards confrontrating the said player(s) at their 'hood' and they begin to spit on you -
Is that a valid reason to do a attack on the said faction?
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 9:57 am
- Ingame name: Richard_Zampa
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
So basically, I've asked through /helpme and I was told yes, but I'll bring it here for confirmation. A tester says it's not stated in the rules, therefore is allowed:
For say, you paid for 100k worth of drugs. With now-a-days, people want money, then you meet up and do the deal. Now let's say, I paid for the amount of drugs and we met up to do the deal. But it was a set up. Three vans hit a corner and surround the dealer, they take the $100,000 back they paid for(not his money), and the $500 on him, including the drugs. Would this be allowed? Similar to the Moltisanti deal where he paid two black men to carry out a hit, ended up killing them and taking the money back because they weren't needed. I want an administrator's response, so players refrain from answering me. Please and thank you!
Figured it was a bit realistic, and I thought I'd bring it here before I tried it in game. This post will be editing and removed once answered to refrain players from noticing and exploiting this if it's allowed.
For say, you paid for 100k worth of drugs. With now-a-days, people want money, then you meet up and do the deal. Now let's say, I paid for the amount of drugs and we met up to do the deal. But it was a set up. Three vans hit a corner and surround the dealer, they take the $100,000 back they paid for(not his money), and the $500 on him, including the drugs. Would this be allowed? Similar to the Moltisanti deal where he paid two black men to carry out a hit, ended up killing them and taking the money back because they weren't needed. I want an administrator's response, so players refrain from answering me. Please and thank you!
Figured it was a bit realistic, and I thought I'd bring it here before I tried it in game. This post will be editing and removed once answered to refrain players from noticing and exploiting this if it's allowed.
- Hater.
- Wannabe Don
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:56 pm
- Ingame name: Aviel
- Location: Israel
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Its considered a scam so its not possible because the scam limit is 50,000.LegendaryKev wrote:So basically, I've asked through /helpme and I was told yes, but I'll bring it here for confirmation. A tester says it's not stated in the rules, therefore is allowed:
For say, you paid for 100k worth of drugs. With now-a-days, people want money, then you meet up and do the deal. Now let's say, I paid for the amount of drugs and we met up to do the deal. But it was a set up. Three vans hit a corner and surround the dealer, they take the $100,000 back they paid for(not his money), and the $500 on him, including the drugs. Would this be allowed? I want an administrator's response, so players refrain from answering me. Please and thank you!
Figured it was a bit realistic, and I thought I'd bring it here before I tried it in game. This post will be editing and removed once answered to refrain players from noticing and exploiting this if it's allowed.
About me LSRP Tester גולני לוחם |
Gabriel Moya - 18th Street Baby Gangsters
Makayla Shaw - W/S Neighborhood Bloods
Hugo Carrasquillo - S/C Los Gangsters XVIII
DeAngelo Brown East Side Hustler Crips
Mateo Gracia Los Cycos XVIII
Ernesto Torres Mara Salvatrucha XIII
Esteban Carlito Colonial Watts Avenue XXVII
-
- Wannabe Mafia
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 12:50 pm
- Ingame name: Marcus_Beasley
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Is it allowed for someone to, for example:
Would this fall under common courtesy if I were to immediately follow them inside and not find them there? It gives them an unfair advantage since they most likely respawn somewhere other than where they /q'd or force crashed due to how interiors work.
- Run from the police, enter a house and then logout to change their skin before logging back in.
Would this fall under common courtesy if I were to immediately follow them inside and not find them there? It gives them an unfair advantage since they most likely respawn somewhere other than where they /q'd or force crashed due to how interiors work.
Former Police Detective II Brett Carson - Los Santos Police Department
Internal Affairs Investigator, Robbery Homicide Division Command, and Uniformed Services Division Command
“Remember, the police are neutral - they hate everybody.”
― J.G. Ballard, Millennium People
- Buster
- Retired Administrator
- Posts: 4901
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:09 am
- Ingame name: Buster_Test
- Location: Philippines
- Contact:
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
In my opinion, they shouldn't /q instantly when cops are chasing them. Unless they have a /ME first of the changing clothes etc(and a screenshot) I think then they can /q to change skin via the UCP, but still, not INSTANTLY.BabyBuffalo wrote:Is it allowed for someone to, for example:
Had this happen to me, so if I had tried to follow them inside they wouldn't be there. I understand that changing their skin simulates them changing their clothes which is reasonable to do while inside of a house.
- Run from the police, enter a house and then logout to change their skin before logging back in.
Would this fall under common courtesy if I were to immediately follow them inside and not find them there? It gives them an unfair advantage since they most likely respawn somewhere other than where they /q'd or force crashed due to how interiors work.
There's the /changeclothes command in a house as well for a reason.
About me
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
- KendrickDuckworth
- Gold Member
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:19 pm
- Ingame name: Remove_Kebab
- Location: Србија
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQtUkfxDcSY[/video]
Fast forward to 8:43 why things like that are happening and no punishment is being given? Isn't it like ''Using Out Of Character information In Character (metagaming) is not allowed.? I mean it's clearly seen here that he just used his OOC ID to check on him?
Fast forward to 8:43 why things like that are happening and no punishment is being given? Isn't it like ''Using Out Of Character information In Character (metagaming) is not allowed.? I mean it's clearly seen here that he just used his OOC ID to check on him?
SHINE BRIGHT LIKE A LEROY
-
- Best Correctional Officer of 2012
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:17 pm
- Ingame name: Galen Hawkins
- Location: Earth
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
Not even twenty seconds later, he mentions why he does that:KendrickDuckworth wrote: Fast forward to 8:43 why things like that are happening and no punishment is being given? Isn't it like ''Using Out Of Character information In Character (metagaming) is not allowed.? I mean it's clearly seen here that he just used his OOC ID to check on him?
Automatic license/number plate recognition is a thing in the United States. It's practically impossible to read license plates from 3rd person without having to adjust your camera (most likely resulting in you crashing into something) or going into first person (again, because of the way the SA engine is, not really practical).
I have no idea if the LSPD allows something like ALPR to be roleplayed, but I can understand the person here claims it because;
Source, page 9Public Executive Research Forum in 2012 wrote: PERF’s survey showed that 71 percent of responding agencies already have LPRs.
But typically, an agency has only a few vehicles equipped with the devices, and they are used for certain limited purposes, such as finding stolen cars or vehicles that have multiple parking violations and can be booted or towed.
But our survey found that almost every police agency expects to acquire or increase their use of LPRs in coming years, and that five years from now, on average they expect to have 25 percent of their cars equipped with LPRs.
I think it'd be more appropriate to ask a high ranking member of the LSPD about the use of Automatic License Plate Readers rather than accuse someone of metagaming while they provide a decent and plausible explanation why they do what they do.
Deputy Warden Galen Hawkins (Former Commissioner)
San Andreas Department of Corrections
San Andreas Department of Corrections
-
- Wannabe Mafia
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:18 pm
Re: Q&A: In-game Rules
What you put is what I was going to say.GHawkins wrote:Not even twenty seconds later, he mentions why he does that:KendrickDuckworth wrote: Fast forward to 8:43 why things like that are happening and no punishment is being given? Isn't it like ''Using Out Of Character information In Character (metagaming) is not allowed.? I mean it's clearly seen here that he just used his OOC ID to check on him?
Automatic license/number plate recognition is a thing in the United States. It's practically impossible to read license plates from 3rd person without having to adjust your camera (most likely resulting in you crashing into something) or going into first person (again, because of the way the SA engine is, not really practical).
I have no idea if the LSPD allows something like ALPR to be roleplayed, but I can understand the person here claims it because;
Source, page 9Public Executive Research Forum in 2012 wrote: PERF’s survey showed that 71 percent of responding agencies already have LPRs.
But typically, an agency has only a few vehicles equipped with the devices, and they are used for certain limited purposes, such as finding stolen cars or vehicles that have multiple parking violations and can be booted or towed.
But our survey found that almost every police agency expects to acquire or increase their use of LPRs in coming years, and that five years from now, on average they expect to have 25 percent of their cars equipped with LPRs.
I think it'd be more appropriate to ask a high ranking member of the LSPD about the use of Automatic License Plate Readers rather than accuse someone of metagaming while they provide a decent and plausible explanation why they do what they do.
Officers have to do it because SAMP makes it impractical.
But really the only officers that should be doing this are like the source said, a small percentage for specific reasons.
In LSRP the officers seem to take the parts that suit them and not the parts that don't.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users