[Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Find all the Laws and Acts of San Andreas in this forum. Also contains the full Penal Code to list all crimes and punishments.

Moderators: Head of Factions, Government Management, Lead Admins

Post Reply
User avatar
Helper
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 793
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:45 pm
Location: stuck in the lobby

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Helper » Fri Jun 09, 2017 6:25 pm

(7)01. Animal Abuse / Cruelty ↑
A person who intentionally maims, mutilates, tortures, wounds, or kills a living animal.
A person whose neglect maims, mutilates, tortures, wounds, or kills a living animal.
A person who owns a pet or animal that is not reasonably considered domesticated, safe, or healthy for the animal or the owner, without a proper permit.
Hunting is technically legal and killing a living animal, shouldn't it be said that hunting would be the exception? Or is it a stupid question..
Image

User avatar
Ward
Mafia
Mafia
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Ward » Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:33 pm

The language isn't specific but the statute applies to domesticated animals or livestock. Likely would not apply to rodent vermin or wildlife covered under hunting provisions. Not a stupid question!

User avatar
tagtag
The Procurer
The Procurer
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:09 pm

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by tagtag » Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:55 pm

That implies slaughtering cattle for meat is also illegal.
Image

Flemwad
LS:RP Tester
LS:RP Tester
Posts: 1104
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:31 am

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Flemwad » Sat Jun 10, 2017 4:32 pm

tagtag wrote:
Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:55 pm
That implies slaughtering cattle for meat is also illegal.
In this case, the spirit of the law would apply. The law was not intended to prevent people from slaughtering cattle for meat.

User avatar
tagtag
The Procurer
The Procurer
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:09 pm

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by tagtag » Sat Jun 10, 2017 4:34 pm

Obviously that particular part is not very significant to most of LSRP, but now that the flaws are pointed out, the wording could be changed.
Image

User avatar
Zuthrex
Special Snowflake
Special Snowflake
Posts: 5426
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:57 pm
Ingame name: Alexa_Fitz

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Zuthrex » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:37 pm

Mr.Filipovic wrote:
Thu Jun 08, 2017 9:30 am
granders wrote:
Tue Jun 06, 2017 8:46 pm
There should be a Marine section covering how to operate watercraft properly, to be honest
That's true, like all players that are operating a watercraft too closely to the shore should get some fine or smth. Speeding closely to the shore etc.
Because the people driving their boats in circles at the fishing job spot are going to follow laws?
little miss
poker champ
👉👌👅🍆

User avatar
Marauder
Game Admin
Game Admin
Posts: 7364
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:29 am

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Marauder » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:56 pm

Imperium wrote:
Fri Jun 09, 2017 12:01 am
Crower wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:46 pm
So, there's a pretty big issue in the Penal Code. The Sultan, Flash, and FCR-900 aren't listen under high speed vehicles. Why is this? HSIU FCR has to be deployed for FCR's, why shouldn't they recieve the high speed charge? We're not allowed to put charges on FCR riders because it doesn't fall into the high speed class somehow. The Sultan is now used for evading 24/7 because they know cops can't deploy HSIU for them, so they stick NOS on and book it.
The FCR-900 has a top speed of 190 km/h (slower than all three police cruisers) so shouldn't fall under "high performance" - its agility is what makes it a problem, not its speed. According to one SA-MP forum post, the Sultan, the Flash, and the three police cruisers have the same top speed of 200 km/h. If your department is not allowing HSIU deployments for Sultans with NOS, then that is an issue with your department, not the Penal Code.
Crower wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:46 pm
Another issue is, street racing. It's gotten to the point where a simple 30 minute jail sentence isn't enough. Add in a three strike system. If they get caught street racing/eluding for three strikes on the record, take the car they were evading in, and crush it. Or just make stricter street racing punishments.
Street racing is not the only thing you can hit them with. Hit them with speeding, reckless driving, failure to yield to a TCD and yield violation, if any are applicable. Take all their money and they'll soon think twice. Alternatively, try going through the courts:
(12)16. Criminal Fines ↑
  1. The Department of Justice may seek Criminal Fines through the State of San Andreas Court, to accompany imprisonment, for all felony and misdemeanor charges. The court shall impose a fine in all cases, except where the defendant establishes that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine. A person who articulates and furnishes financial documentation to indicate financial difficulties with paying the fine shall be afforded additional time to pay the fine through a deadline established by the courts or through a payment plan to the Department of Justice. The fines may stack. The fines are as follows:
    • $25,000 for any misdemeanor charges.
    • $50,000 for any non-violent felony.
    • $100,000 for any violent felony.
    • $150,000 for (1)09. Murder
Street racing and vehicular endangerment would result in a $50,000 (or $100,000 if they attempt to elude) fine, plus whatever else you added on (speeding, failure to yield to a TCD, etc). If people get fined $50,000+ ($100,000+ if they attempt to elude) every time they decide to street race, they'll soon stop.
That requires them and the arresting LEO to want to go through the courts tho.
Marauder Event Team Assistant
Head of Media/News Team Level 1 Admin
Faction Management • State Assembly
Marissa Hazeldine
#SometimesI'mAlsoALawyer

User avatar
Mr.Filipovic
Wannabe Mafia
Wannabe Mafia
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:42 pm
Ingame name: Amy Muller
Location: Croatian Republic of Herzeg Bosnia.

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Mr.Filipovic » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:07 pm

Zuthrex wrote:
Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:37 pm
Mr.Filipovic wrote:
Thu Jun 08, 2017 9:30 am
granders wrote:
Tue Jun 06, 2017 8:46 pm
There should be a Marine section covering how to operate watercraft properly, to be honest
That's true, like all players that are operating a watercraft too closely to the shore should get some fine or smth. Speeding closely to the shore etc.
Because the people driving their boats in circles at the fishing job spot are going to follow laws?
Well, I'm too long on sea and I know how it works. But once you fine them all they'll start enforcing the law.
Image

'Dok lezis poput vile
uz miris robe bile
bez tebe sve bi ovo
vec odavno k' vragu otislo"

User avatar
Arrdef
Wannabe Mafia
Wannabe Mafia
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:01 am
Ingame name: Lehmbeck
Location: France

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Arrdef » Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:43 pm

(4)08. Perjury
  1. A person who knowingly provides false information while under oath in a court of law
  2. A person who knowingly provides false information as part of an affidavit, testimony, court-ordered deposition, or document with a statement signifying its authenticity under penalty of perjury.
  3. This charge cannot stack with (4)06. False Information To A Government Employee.
Does this charge apply to officers who knowlingly put information proven to be false in written reports? Or is this strictly an instance of Fraud / Corruption of Public Duty?

Flemwad
LS:RP Tester
LS:RP Tester
Posts: 1104
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:31 am

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Flemwad » Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:58 pm

Arrdef wrote:
Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:43 pm
(4)08. Perjury
  1. A person who knowingly provides false information while under oath in a court of law
  2. A person who knowingly provides false information as part of an affidavit, testimony, court-ordered deposition, or document with a statement signifying its authenticity under penalty of perjury.
  3. This charge cannot stack with (4)06. False Information To A Government Employee.
Does this charge apply to officers who knowlingly put information proven to be false in written reports? Or is this strictly an instance of Fraud / Corruption of Public Duty?
It does not. Making knowingly false statements in a report would fall under the generic corruption of public duty.

User avatar
Hadrian
Gangster
Gangster
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:32 pm

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Hadrian » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:13 am

What's the logic behind a harsher sentence for prostitution and a lighter one for pandering?
Police Detective II Michael Caracalla

Organized Crime & Vice Division

Flemwad
LS:RP Tester
LS:RP Tester
Posts: 1104
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:31 am

Re: [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

Post by Flemwad » Sat Jun 24, 2017 4:55 am

Hadrian wrote:
Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:13 am
What's the logic behind a harsher sentence for prostitution and a lighter one for pandering?
Good question. Not everything was logically made. That's something to suggest in the next penal code update.

Post Reply

Return to “Laws & Acts of San Andreas”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest